---
author:
- contributor_roles: []
  family: Edmunds
  given: Scott
  url: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-1436
blog:
  authors: null
  community_id: 52db0518-e228-4260-8c54-c4e323b2569d
  created: 1675555200
  current_feed_url: null
  description: Data driven blogging from the GigaScience editors
  doi: https://doi.org/10.59350/gigablog
  favicon: https://rogue-scholar.org/api/communities/52db0518-e228-4260-8c54-c4e323b2569d/logo
  feed_format: application/atom+xml
  feed_url: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/feed/atom/
  filter: null
  generator: Other
  home_page_url: https://gigasciencejournal.com/blog
  issn: null
  language: eng
  license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
  prefix: '10.59350'
  relative_url: null
  secure: false
  slug: gigablog
  status: archived
  subfield: '1311'
  title: GigaBlog
  updated: null
  use_api: null
container: GigaBlog
date: '2018-04-25T00:00:00+00:00'
date_updated: '2025-12-06T10:25:39+00:00'
guid: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/?p=2372
identifier: https://doi.org/10.59350/2r0wm-tt192
image: https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/72x72/1f642.png
images:
- alt: "\U0001F642"
  src: https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/72x72/1f642.png
- alt: DNA Day in the jungle
  height: '225'
  sizes: '(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px'
  src: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-300x225.jpg
  srcset: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-300x225.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-768x576.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-1024x768.jpg
  width: '300'
- alt: Snakes and a nanopore.
  height: '200'
  sizes: '(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px'
  src: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-300x200.jpg
  srcset: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-300x200.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-768x512.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-1024x682.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore.jpg
  width: '300'
- alt: DNA Day in Hong Kong
  height: '225'
  sizes: '(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px'
  src: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-300x225.jpg
  srcset: http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-300x225.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-768x576.jpg,
    http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-1024x768.jpg
  width: '300'
issn: null
keywords:
- Developing World
- Technology
- DNA Barcoding
- DNA Day
- Genomics
lang: en
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
rid: rt3j7-y1t47
rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
summary: <strong> I'm a genomicist, get me into here. </strong> Today is DNA Day,
  commemorating the day in 1953 when Watson, Crick, Wilkins, Franklin et al. published
  their Nature papers on the structure of DNA, as well as the day in 2003 that the
  completion of the Human Genome Project was declared.
title: 'DNA Day in the Jungle. Aaron Pomerantz on #JungleOmics'
url: https://wayback.archive-it.org/22098/2025-05-01T17:13:42Z/http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/dnaday2018
version: v1
---

**I\'m a genomicist, get me into here.**\
Today is [DNA Day](https://www.genome.gov/10506367/national-dna-day/),
commemorating the day in 1953 when [Watson,
Crick](https://www.nature.com/articles/171737a0), Wilkins, Franklin et
al. published their Nature papers on the structure of DNA, as well as
the day in 2003 that the completion of the Human Genome Project was
declared. Or at least when the project conceded \"the remaining tiny
gaps \[we\]re considered too costly to fill\". This 65th and 15th
anniversary of the DNA structure and human genomes is a good point to
look back at how far molecular biology and genomics has advanced in that
time. From an enormous Manhattan-like project (co-incidentally [also
involving Los Alamos](http://la-science.lanl.gov/lascience20.shtml))
genomics has evolved and democratised to such an extent that it can now
be carried out anywhere via hand-held Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencers.
We\'ve charted the rise and development of these nanopore sequencers in
many papers (including the [first whole bacterial genome assembly in
2014](https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-3-22)), and a [new
paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy033) just out this month
takes DNA sequencing and genomics to a completely new place: the jungle.

> Welcome to my laboratory
> ![🙂](https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/72x72/1f642.png){.wp-smiley
> style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;"}
>
> Sequencing long ribosomal cluster from plants, insects & fungi in
> real-time in the Amazon rainforest. Within a few mins of
> [@nanopore](https://twitter.com/nanopore?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) data
> generated, performed BLAST & got correct hits! Dual indexing looks
> great for pooling many
> samples[\#junglegenomics](https://twitter.com/hashtag/junglegenomics?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
> [pic.twitter.com/UQVjYfmU8U](https://t.co/UQVjYfmU8U)
>
> --- Aaron Pomerantz (@AaronPomerantz) [April 2,
> 2018](https://twitter.com/AaronPomerantz/status/980873273348038656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

Following in the footsteps of our many [author
Q&A\'s](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/tag/qa/) we thought we would
interview first author Aaron Pomerantz on his work, where genomics has
taken him, and his view of where the field of genomics is on DNA Day
2018.

**Tell us a bit about yourself and how you got into this area of
research?**

::: {#attachment_2376 .wp-caption .alignright style="width: 310px"}
![DNA Day in the
jungle](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-300x225.jpg){.size-medium
.wp-image-2376 loading="lazy" decoding="async"
aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2376"
srcset="http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-300x225.jpg 300w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-768x576.jpg 768w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/35_Lab_Field-1024x768.jpg 1024w"
sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="225"}

Aaron Pomeratz in his natural environment -- sequencing DNA in the
jungle.
:::

I was always fascinated with biodiversity and the natural world growing
up, but never envisioned I\'d be a scientist using portable technology
in a rainforest one day. During my B.S. degree I studied entomology and
followed up with a M.S. degree focusing on molecular biology techniques.
It was right after my M.S. that I visited a colleague on a research trip
to Peru and happened to be offered a position as a field biologist at
the [Tambopata Research
Center](http://www.perunature.com/amazon_lodge/tambopata-research-center/){saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en-GB&q=http://www.perunature.com/amazon_lodge/tambopata-research-center/&source=gmail&ust=1524642261845000&usg=AFQjCNFxfdAfGH6wjtYKOdodMV-ieNLgrw"},
in the heart of the Amazon rainforest. During this time, I became
interested in applying portable scientific instruments to fieldwork, and
the timing was right with newly developed tools, such as the
[Foldscope](https://www.foldscope.com/){saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en-GB&q=https://www.foldscope.com/&source=gmail&ust=1524642261845000&usg=AFQjCNHbs1S6Y42YPsVn3bj3E0O1wrQCqw"}
(an origami-based microscope) and the Oxford Nanopore Technologies
[MinION](https://nanoporetech.com/){saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en-GB&q=https://nanoporetech.com/&source=gmail&ust=1524642261845000&usg=AFQjCNFqRqpdvpm_Wbrdh-LPkEYNdAtl4w"}
(a portable DNA sequencer). I was fortunate to receive grant funding
from the National Geographic Society to apply this new idea and tools to
biodiversity research in the tropics and have worked to advance this
developing area of research now as a PhD candidate at UC Berkeley.

**Today is DNA Day, and as it\'s the 15th anniversary of the completion
of the human genome project, where \$3billion USD and took a decade to
sequence a single reference genome. Predominantly carried out in
cavernous sequencing centers in a few wealthy countries. How does this
contrast with your current work?**

I think anyone who spends time around genome sequencing projects hears
the adage of how far we\'ve come in recent years with advancements in
sequencing technologies and how much it has dropped in price since the
\"early days\" of the first human genome. But it\'s still incredible to
take a step back and think about how this rapid change with sequencing
genetic material is impacting scientific research today. I\'m
enthusiastic about the sequencers themselves dropping in price and
becoming portable, because this allows for greater access to communities
beyond extensive sequencing facilities in wealthy countries, especially
in the context of biodiversity, environmental, and epidemiology
research. Thus far I have primarily worked in Peru and Ecuador, where it
is difficult to find access to any kind of sequencing platform within
the country, and this lack of equipment can significantly delay or
hinder research efforts when samples must be shipped internationally.
For my own work, it\'s hard to express how exciting it has been to
collaborate with local researchers and test out our ability to rapidly
identify plant, animal, and fungal species without ever leaving the
rainforest. I think in the near future, obtaining genetic information
from an organism will be as simple of a task as taking a photo on our
cell phone is today.

**The human genome project used \"1st generation\" sanger sequencing
technology, and the massive explosion of genomics research of the last
decade has relied on super cheap \"2nd generation\" sequencing
technology. This study used a new 3rd generation nanopore sequencing
approach, so how was that useful to your project?**

::: {#attachment_2375 .wp-caption .alignleft style="width: 310px"}
![Snakes and a
nanopore.](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-300x200.jpg){.size-medium
.wp-image-2375 loading="lazy" decoding="async"
aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2375"
srcset="http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-300x200.jpg 300w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-768x512.jpg 768w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore-1024x682.jpg 1024w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1_Viper_Nanopore.jpg 2000w"
sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="200"}

Snakes not on a plane. Courtesy of A Pomerantz.
:::

What interests me about \"3rd generation\" nanopore sequencing is that
it is so fundamentally different from the previous platforms, especially
with the ability to sequence long stretches of native DNA or RNA
molecules in real-time. The utility of the MinION nanopore platform is
that it\'s small (making my cell phone look bulky in comparison) and can
simply run off the power of my laptop. The read data starts to generate
immediately, so while attempting to identify species through DNA
sequencing, I can take some raw reads, search against a database, and
start to get a sense of what it is within minutes while in the field. In
a nutshell, I think nanopore sequencing is so compelling for projects
like my own because of the ability to sequence anything, anywhere,
anytime.

**The human genome project was an international effort involving the US,
UK, Japan, France, Germany, Spain and China (which [involved our
co-publishers BGI](https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS1672-0229(04)02009-1)).
In that case the reference DNA was shipped across the world between
giant sequencing labs, so what advantages does bringing the sequencers
to the DNA rather than the other way now bring?**

::: {#attachment_2377 .wp-caption .alignright style="width: 310px"}
![DNA Day in Hong
Kong](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-300x225.jpg){.size-medium
.wp-image-2377 loading="lazy" decoding="async"
aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2377"
srcset="http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-300x225.jpg 300w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-768x576.jpg 768w, http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Illumina_Hiseq_2000_sequencers_BGI_Hong_Kong_sequencing_room-1024x768.jpg 1024w"
sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="225"}

The view from BGI Hong Kong
:::

Portable sequencing still entails some challenges, and there are certain
contexts when it is useful to be in a more controlled laboratory setting
with your sample. However, I think bringing the lab to the sample,
rather than shipping the sample to a lab, can be a fundamental shift in
how we think about many aspects of fieldwork and international projects.
Rapid disease diagnostics, biodiversity assessments, wildlife/timber
trafficking, and water/food quality are some of the areas where I think
it can be far more advantageous to bring the sequencer to the field
rather than ship material abroad.

**[We\'ve previously
covered](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/bringing-wildlife-forensics-into-the-omics-era-qa-with-alfred-arulandhu-and-martijn-staats/){saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en-GB&q=http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/bringing-wildlife-forensics-into-the-omics-era-qa-with-alfred-arulandhu-and-martijn-staats/&source=gmail&ust=1524642261845000&usg=AFQjCNHK1anblGalKYW2lwlkVyQsHle6Tg"} how
second generation sequencing technology is shaking up wildlife forensics
by massively increasing the throughput and decreasing the cost. How do
you think 3rd generation nanopore technology can take conservation and
wildlife protection further?**

In our paper, I thought it was appropriate to conclude by saying,

*\"While we live in a period of amazing technological change,
biodiversity and ecosystem health are decreasing worldwide. Portable
sequencing will not be a silver bullet for conservation biology but it
can be a powerful tool to more efficiently obtain information about the
diversity of life on our planet.\"*

Current sequencing technologies have significantly increased in
throughput and decreased in cost per sample, which is important for
making conservation projects more robust and cost-effective. But these
current sequencing platforms themselves are still prohibitively
expensive and primarily relegated to facilities in wealthy countries,
whereas the most biodiverse and threatened regions on the planet are
typically in less developed parts of the world. Therefore, I think the
advantage of portable nanopore technology is that it can bridge this gap
by bringing the lab into the field, serving as a tool to quickly obtain
genetic information that can be used to identify species/populations,
establish geographic distributions, aid with *in situ* conservation
actions, *ex situ* breeding programs, and promote conservation law
efforts. The next steps will be finding ways to make portable sequencing
more cost-effective by processing numerous samples per run, developing
easy to use tools for upstream processing of DNA/RNA in the field, and
efficient downstream bioinformatics analyses, which are areas myself and
collaborators are actively working on now.

**We\'ve come an incredibly long way in the last 15 years, so where do
you think this technology and field will be in another 15 years?**

If you told me just a few years ago that people would be sequencing DNA
in jungles, [the arctic](https://doi.org/10.1101/073965), [and
space](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18364-0), I probably
wouldn\'t believe you. It\'s hard to imagine where sequencing technology
will be 15 years from now, but myself and others have envisioned a sort
of \'handheld DNA scanner\' that someone can fit in their pocket and
sequence genomes in minutes. With the advent of nanopore sequencing, I
think this technology can get us to that easy sample-to-DNA device to
answer your biological question, whether it\'s sequencing a person to
find out what\'s making them sick, identifying a new species, or winning
a bet in the sushi restaurant if that tuna really is tuna. As a PhD
candidate right now, I\'m very excited to be in the biological sciences.
Working alongside others using new technology to address big challenges
and understand the natural world is what drives me and what makes me
optimistic about more advances to come in the next 15 years!

**Further Reading**\
Pomerantz A, Peñafiel N, Arteaga A, Bustamante L, Pichardo F, Coloma LA,
Barrio-Amorós CL, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Prost S. Real-time DNA barcoding
in a rainforest using nanopore sequencing: opportunities for rapid
biodiversity assessments and local capacity building. Gigascience. 2018
Apr 1;7(4). doi:
[10.1093/gigascience/giy033](https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy033).

The post [DNA Day in the Jungle. Aaron Pomerantz on
\#JungleOmics](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog/dnaday2018/){rel="nofollow"}
appeared first on
[GigaBlog](http://gigasciencejournal.com/blog){rel="nofollow"}.